- Home
- Academic Information
- Admissions
- Financial Assistance
- Masters Students
- Doctoral Students
- Postdoctoral Scholars
- Student Life
- Policies & Procedures
- About Us
Quick Links
Academic Grievance Procedures
Contents
- Introduction
- Applicability of the Grievance Procedures
- Overview of Student Grievance Process
- Steps to Follow in the Grievance Process
- Graduate School Grievance Officer
- Rackham Appeals Panel
- Rackham Appeals Board
- Action by the Dean
- Miscellaneous
I. Introduction
This document describes the procedures provided by the Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies for resolving academically related complaints or grievances. Included is information concerning the applicability of the Rackham Grievance Procedures, an overview of the grievance process, and detailed sections on each of the stages in the process.
Although the procedures described make provision for formal adjudication of academic disputes between students and faculty or administrators, it should be noted that the emphasis in the procedures is on a more informal form of intervention; that is, mediation. Mediation allows the disputants, working with the Grievance Officer, to construct a resolution that has been mutually agreed upon and that is satisfactory to both parties.
II. Applicability of the Grievance Procedures
- Subject Matter
[Unless the matter has been reviewed under other University procedures.] These procedures are available for the review of grievances concerning academic matters, including but not limited to:
- All aspects of the degree process involving grading, evaluation,
or status;
- Alleged unprofessional conduct toward students;
- Allegedly unfair or discriminatory, treatment of students;
- Allegedly unfair disciplinary action taken as a result of allegations
or findings of student academic misconduct; however, these procedures
may not be used to appeal a decision of a Graduate Academic Judiciary
Board regarding violations of the Graduate School's policy on academic
integrity. Applicable appeals procedures for that purpose are provided
in the document "Academic Integrity Policy and Procedures;"
- All aspects of the degree process involving grading, evaluation,
or status;
- Grievant
These procedures are applicable and shall be the "controlling appellate procedures" for students registered in the Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies; [however the same issue may not be reheard under the procedures if it has already been reviewed under another applicable University procedure]
- Students in interdisciplinary programs under the direction of
the Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies shall use these
procedures.
- Students in a different school, college or unit from that of
the respondent shall use these procedures.
- Students in schools, colleges or units without established applicable
formal grievance procedures.
- These procedures may also be used by students in a school, college
or unit with an established applicable formal grievance procedure,
who have reason to believe that they could not receive a fair and
impartial hearing in that unit. They may, through the Rackham Grievance
Officer, petition the Vice-President for Academic Affairs for a
change of venue. If, in consulting with the unit, the Vice-President
concludes that it is uncertain that the student can receive a fair
hearing, the Vice-President shall endorse the petition for a change
of venue and these procedures shall then be used.
- Students who have pursued a formal grievance procedure in their own school, college or unit may not submit the grievance for review under these procedures.
- Students in interdisciplinary programs under the direction of
the Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies shall use these
procedures.
III. Overview of Student Grievance Process
- Informal Resolution Attempted at Department or Unit Level.
- Informal Mediation of Grievance Attempted by Rackham Grievance Officer.
- Formal Resolution Sought at School or College Level or at Rackham
level.
- Appeal Reviewed and Acted Upon by Rackham Appeals Panel
- Appeal Heard by Rackham Appeals Board
- Appeal Reviewed and Acted Upon by Rackham Appeals Panel
IV. Steps to Follow in the Grievance Process
These steps must be followed in the order in which they are presented.
- The student should attempt to resolve the grievance with the individual
faculty member, the department or the unit involved.
- If it is resolved, the grievance ends.
- If it is unresolved and the student elects to continue the grievance
process, he/she may go to Step B.
- If it is resolved, the grievance ends.
- The student may bring the grievance, in writing, to the Graduate School
Officer, who will attempt to mediate a resolution between the student
and the faculty member(s), department or unit.
- If it is resolved, the grievance ends.
- If it is unresolved and the student elects to continue the grievance
process, he/she may go to Step C.
- If it is resolved, the grievance ends.
- The student may request a formal hearing, at the school or college
level, if there are applicable procedures at that level. (Only if there
are no procedures at this level or if the student is granted a change
of venue (see Section II.B.4), may he/she move directly
from Step B to Step D. Following a hearing and a decision at the school
or college level, the grievance is presumed to be resolved.
- If the Rackham Appeals Panel is to be employed (see Section
II, above) the grievant shall submit a written statement of the
grievance to the Grievance Officer, who shall then forward the grievance
to the Rackham Appeals Panel.
- If the Panel rules that the Rackham procedures are not applicable,
or that based on the facts stated by the grievant, viewed in the
light most favorable to the grievant, that there is no basis for
relief, the appeal is denied.
- If the panel rules that the Rackham Grievance Procedures are applicable,
and that a hearing of the appeal is warranted.
- If the Panel rules that the Rackham procedures are not applicable,
or that based on the facts stated by the grievant, viewed in the
light most favorable to the grievant, that there is no basis for
relief, the appeal is denied.
- The appeal is forwarded to a three-member Appeals Board for a hearing.
- If the Appeals Board, after preliminary fact-finding, rules that
the procedures are not applicable or that on the basis of the facts
stated by the grievant and viewed in the light most favorable to
the grievant, no remedy is possible, a continuation of the hearing
process is denied.
- If applicable, a hearing is held and a decision is rendered.
- The Board's findings and recommendations are submitted to the Dean of the Graduate School, who makes the final decision.
- If the Appeals Board, after preliminary fact-finding, rules that
the procedures are not applicable or that on the basis of the facts
stated by the grievant and viewed in the light most favorable to
the grievant, no remedy is possible, a continuation of the hearing
process is denied.
V. Graduate School Grievance Officer
- General
The Graduate School Grievance Officer occupies a key place in the grievance process. The Grievance Officer gives initial advice to the grievant about both informal and formal processes. The Officer investigates and determines whether informal mediation with departmental or other agencies is appropriate. If a formal appeal is initiated and these procedures become the controlling appellate procedures, the Grievance Officer functions as an expediter and staff liaison for the entire process.
- Appointment
The Graduate School Grievance Officer is appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School.
- Specific Powers and Duties
- The Grievance Officer provides advice and informal mediation for
any student presently or previously registered in the Horace H.
Rackham School of Graduate Studies having a complaint or a grievance
related to academic matters.
- If the Grievance Officer determines that no mediated resolution
is possible, he/she may recommend that the student attempt to resolve
the grievance using appropriate school or college procedures for
a formal appeal.
- If informal mediation and/or formal procedures initiated at the
departmental or sub-unit level have resulted in a definitive decision
which is unacceptable to the student, the Grievance Officer seeks
to obtain a written statement from the departmental chairman or
sub-unit supervisor setting forth the facts in the case as he or
she perceives them, the decision arrived at, and the reasons for
the decision.
- If the student wishes to file a formal appeal, the Grievance Officer
determines whether these Rackham Academic Grievance Procedures are
applicable to the subject matter of the complaint, whether they
are the controlling appellate procedures, or whether the case may
be appealed because of sub-unit action or inaction. These decisions
are subject to review by the Rackham Appeals Panel pursuant to Section
III.C.2.
- The Grievance Officer provides procedural information and necessary
assistance to the Vice President in cases of a request for a change
of venue.
- The Grievance Officer supervises the storage and retrieval of
the records of all proceedings conducted by the Grievance Officer,
the Appeals Panel and the Appeals Board.
- The Grievance Officer provides advice and informal mediation for
any student presently or previously registered in the Horace H.
Rackham School of Graduate Studies having a complaint or a grievance
related to academic matters.
- Rules and Procedures for Mediation by the Grievance Officer
A student who is dissatisfied with attempts to informally resolve a grievance at the departmental or unit level, may bring the grievance to the Graduate School Grievance Officer.
- The grievance must be in writing. It should state the basis of
the complaint, summarize the facts which support it, and describe
attempts which have been made to resolve the grievance and the outcomes
of those attempts.
- The grievance should be submitted to the Grievance Officer within
thirty days after the student learns of the decision reached by
the faculty member, department or sub-unit.
- The Grievance Officer may consult experts in the field when complex
issues are involved, and may consult members of the department or
unit when questions about customary or acceptable practices are
raised.
- Except as otherwise provided by law or Regental policy, direct
access to departmental or other official files shall be only through
the Grievance Officer. Either party may request the Grievance Officer
to examine such files and to provide a general summary of their
contents as they relate to the grievance, giving due regard to the
protection of confidential material.
- Any mediated resolution reached and agreed to by both parties
must be in writing. It should contain the findings of fact, the
decision, the reasons for the decision, the policy basis or criteria
applied in reaching the decision and, if applicable, specific deadlines
for implementing the resolution. This document will be prepared
by the Grievance Officer, and must be approved in writing by the
parties involved. This written summary shall also be used in instances
where the parties were unable to reach a mediated resolution of
the grievance, and the student requests a formal hearing or an appeal.
- All mediative proceedings of the Graduate School Grievance Officer
will be closed to the public and confidential.
- The grievance must be in writing. It should state the basis of
the complaint, summarize the facts which support it, and describe
attempts which have been made to resolve the grievance and the outcomes
of those attempts.
- Disqualification
- When a formal complaint to the Graduate School is made and these procedures are ruled applicable, the Grievance Officer may disqualify herself or himself as mediator and transfer the case directly to the Graduate School Appeals Panel. The Dean of the Graduate School may choose to select a replacement to act as staff liaison, if appropriate. Self-disqualification may be for reasons such as bias, appearance of partiality, or involvement in the prior stages of the process that would preclude a useful participation in the just and speedy termination of the case. Decisions regarding disqualification or self-disqualification are subject to review of the Appeals Panel at the request of either party.
VI. Rackham Appeals Panel
- General
Any grievance to which these procedures are applicable (Section II, above), and which is taken beyond the Graduate School Grievance Officer may be reviewed and ruled upon by the Graduate School Appeals Panel.
- Panel Composition
- Eight members of the graduate school faculty will be appointed
as panelists by the Dean of the Graduate School, with the input
from the Senate Advisory Committee on University Affairs, and will
serve for three years.
- Four graduate students will be nominated by Rackham Student Government
and appointed as panelists by the Dean of the Graduate School to
serve for one year.
- An Appeals Panel will be formed as the need arises. Each Panel
will consist of three panelists, two faculty members and a student,
selected from the twelve panelists in a random manner by the Grievance
Officer. Panelists from the immediate department or sub-unit involved
in the grievance shall not be eligible to serve. In the event that
one or more of the three selected panelists is unable to serve on
the Panel in a timely manner, the Grievance Officer will select,
at random, a substitute. The three member panel will convene without
a chair and the decision will be issued by all three members.
- If a panelist steps down between September 1 and June 1 of the
following calendar year, the Dean will issue an invitation for a
replacement to be selected from the previous years nominees, wherever
possible. Additional or substitute faculty and student panelists
may be appointed by the Dean as needed.
- Eight members of the graduate school faculty will be appointed
as panelists by the Dean of the Graduate School, with the input
from the Senate Advisory Committee on University Affairs, and will
serve for three years.
- Powers and Duties of the Appeals Panel
- The Panel may refuse to accept an appeal for hearing if it determines
that these Rackham Academic Appeals Procedures are not applicable
to the case or it may delegate that decision to an Appeals Board.
- The Panel may refuse to accept an appeal for hearing if it determines
that, on the basis of the facts stated by the grievant, viewed in
the light most favorable to the grievant, there is no basis for
relief or it may delegate that decision to an Appeals Board.
- The Panel may consolidate for hearing by one Appeals Board several
cases involving common questions of fact.
- The Panel may refuse to accept an appeal for hearing if it determines
that these Rackham Academic Appeals Procedures are not applicable
to the case or it may delegate that decision to an Appeals Board.
- Procedures and Deadlines for a Rackham Appeals Panel Review
- If a student wishes to have grievance outcome reviewed by the
Rackham Appeals Panel, for possible referral to a Rackham Appeals
Board for a formal hearing, he/she must observe the following requirements:
- The appeal must be in writing. It must state the basis for
the grievance and the facts that support it. This should include
a summary of the steps which have already been taken to resolve
the grievance, reasons why the student finds the resolutions
unfair or unsatisfactory, and a statement of the desired remedy.
- The written appeal must be presented to the Graduate School
Grievance Officer within 30 days after the student has received
notice of a decision from a department, school or college, or
from the Grievance Officer.
- The appeal must be in writing. It must state the basis for
the grievance and the facts that support it. This should include
a summary of the steps which have already been taken to resolve
the grievance, reasons why the student finds the resolutions
unfair or unsatisfactory, and a statement of the desired remedy.
- The Grievance Officer forwards copies of the written appeal and
any written statement the respondent wishes to submit to the Appeals
Panel and arranges a date and place for the Panel to meet and act
on the written appeal. The parties involved do not appear at this
meeting of the Panel.
- The decision of the Appeals Panel must be made available, in writing,
to the parties involved within two weeks after the decision has
been made.
- The Panel may alter a deadline specified in these procedures on
written petition of either party demonstrating an acceptable reason
for delay. When ever the Panel extends a deadline, it must also
set an alternate date.
- If the Panel itself needs to extend a deadline, it must request
an extension from the Dean of the Graduate School. Again, an
alternate date must be set.
- If the Panel itself needs to extend a deadline, it must request
an extension from the Dean of the Graduate School. Again, an
alternate date must be set.
- The determination of the Appeals Panel as to whether a hearing is warranted is final.
- If a student wishes to have grievance outcome reviewed by the
Rackham Appeals Panel, for possible referral to a Rackham Appeals
Board for a formal hearing, he/she must observe the following requirements:
VII. Rackham Appeals Board
- General
Rackham Academic Appeals Board shall hear and rule on grievances passed to it by the Appeals Panel. The role of the Board is to hear and weigh the facts as presented and to render a decision on behalf of the University community. Those selected to serve on the Board do NOT act as advocates for the parties involved in the grievance.
- Board Selection and Composition
- Each side will be provided with the names and University position
of Panel members eligible to serve on an Appeals Board. Panel members
from the immediate department or sub-unit involved in the grievance
shall not be eligible to serve on a Board.
- Within one week after such notification, each of the two parties
shall select one eligible member of the Appeals Panel to serve on
the Appeals Board. The Chair of the Appeals Panel should be notified
of the selections, and the two members so chosen shall select the
third member from the remainder of the Panel.
- Within three days after the Dean of the Graduate School has been
notified of the Board's composition, the Dean will designate one
of its members to be chair.
- Each side will be provided with the names and University position
of Panel members eligible to serve on an Appeals Board. Panel members
from the immediate department or sub-unit involved in the grievance
shall not be eligible to serve on a Board.
- Powers and Duties of Appeals Boards
- A Board may refuse to accept an appeal for hearing or summarily
terminate a hearing, if it determines that these Rackham Academic
Appeals Procedures are not applicable to the case.
- A Board may refuse to accept an appeal for hearing or summarily
terminate a hearing if it determines that, on the basis of the facts
stated by the grievant, viewed in the light most favorable to the
grievant, there is no basis for relief.
- The Board may alter a deadline specified in these procedures on
written petition from either party demonstrating an acceptable reason
for delay. If the Board itself needs to extend a deadline, it must
request an extension from the Dean of the Graduate School. Again,
an alternate date must be set.
- A Board may refuse to accept an appeal for hearing or summarily
terminate a hearing, if it determines that these Rackham Academic
Appeals Procedures are not applicable to the case.
- Format for Appeals Board Hearings
The following rules and format will be used for Appeals Board Hearings. A more detailed agenda and specific guidelines for each individual hearing may be determined by the Appeals Board in consultation with both parties.
- Both the grievant and the respondent may make oral statements
to factually support their claims. They may also call witnesses
to provide corroborating testimony or evidence.
- The Board will question the grievant, the respondent and their
witnesses. The Board may also question witnesses it has itself called
to testify.
- The grievant and the respondent may offer rebuttal to charges
that the other has made.
- The grievant and the respondent may make closing statements.
- Both the grievant and the respondent may make oral statements
to factually support their claims. They may also call witnesses
to provide corroborating testimony or evidence.
- Procedural Rules for Board Hearings
The following guidelines will apply to hearings before an Appeals Board, along with any additional rules deemed appropriate by the Appeals Board in consultation with the parties involved:
- The grievant and the respondent may each be accompanied by an advisor, who will have no independent right to question witnesses.
- Prior to the hearing each party should provide a list of witnesses who will testify on his/her behalf, along with any documents he/she wishes to present as evidence. This information will be available to the opposing party as well as to the Board. The deadline for submission will be set by the Board.
- If new evidence is presented at the Board hearing which requires additional time for response by the other party or for investigation by the Board, the Chairperson, with the consent of the other Board members, may adjourn the meeting to another time.
- A complete tape recording of the proceedings will be made and preserved for at least one year, or up to five years at the request of either party. Failure to produce or preserve an audible tape shall not be grounds for setting aside any determinations of the Appeals Board.
- Information acquired by the Grievance Officer may be used as evidence before the Board, unless either party's objection is sustained by the Board.
- Appeals Board Report
- The Appeals Board will prepare a report setting forth its findings,
and shall make recommendations for action or remedy, to the Dean
of the Graduate School. A copy of the report shall be sent to both
parties.
- The ruling of the Appeals Board is final.
- The Appeals Board will prepare a report setting forth its findings,
and shall make recommendations for action or remedy, to the Dean
of the Graduate School. A copy of the report shall be sent to both
parties.
VIII. Action by the Dean
- The Dean shall review the report and the Board's recommendations,
and shall make the final decision.
- Enforcement
- If any party does not comply with the decision, the Board or any
party may seek full compliance upon the Dean and Executive Board
of the Graduate School.
- The Dean may assist in obtaining full compliance through the Dean or Director of the appropriate unit, or, if necessary, through the Vice President for Academic Affairs and the President of the University.
- If any party does not comply with the decision, the Board or any
party may seek full compliance upon the Dean and Executive Board
of the Graduate School.
IX. Miscellaneous
- Penalties for Failure to Testify
Either party may refuse to testify and no punitive action will be taken which arises directly from this refusal. However, such refusal may have an influence on the general impression created by the party refusing to testify and will become part of the record.
- Procedure When Grievant Is Not in Residence
If a grievant is not living reasonably close to Ann Arbor at the time a deadline for filing an appeal arrives, the grievant may file a statement of intention to appeal and take up to 60 days to initiate a formal appeal.
- General Time Limitations
These procedures are not available if the facts that form the basis of the grievance occurred more than 180 days before the initiation of the appeal.
- Special Concurrent Procedure
Actions may proceed concurrently under these procedures and under another grievance procedure only when the other procedure has substantially different purposes and remedies (such as a labor arbitration procedure). In such cases, the Graduate School Grievance Officer shall act as coordinator with the other appropriate agent. If the Grievance Officer has disqualified herself or himself, the Dean shall appoint another coordinator.