Skip to:

Academic Dispute Resolution

Introduction

Rackham’s Academic Dispute Resolution Policy and Procedures are available to Rackham students who have a dispute or disagreement with faculty or staff about the equity and fairness of decisions or procedures that affect their academic standing, the conduct of their research, and progress toward the degree. Such issues may arise regarding fair and equal treatment in the conduct of a class, in the pursuit of the student’s research, and in the grading or evaluation of academic work and research. Other issues may concern the equity and fairness of program, department or Rackham policies.

Academic dispute resolution is a means for resolving disputes and achieving a workable outcome for all parties, within the integrity policies of the University. Resolutions are not imposed, but result from agreement of all parties.

The Rackham Resolution Officer, Darlene Ray-Johnson, is responsible for managing this policy and may be reached at RackResolutionOfficer@umich.edu. Additional options for informal dispute resolution services and resources can be found in the help and support section of the website.

Scope of the Policy

The Rackham Academic Dispute Resolution policy applies to disputes Rackham graduate students may have with faculty or staff regarding equity and fair treatment that may have an impact on grading or evaluation, on research activities related to or required by the graduate program, or other treatment that affects academic standing. This policy may not be used to appeal grade-related or other academic sanctions imposed as a result of any action taken under any honor code or academic integrity policy.

Other University policies and procedures apply to allegations of faculty and staff misconduct; such matters will be governed by appropriate policies administered under other University units:

  • Complaints that a member of the faculty or staff has engaged in research misconduct will be handled by the Office of the Vice President for Research.
  • Complaints that a member of the faculty or staff has violated the University's non-discrimination and harassment policies will be investigated by the University's Office of Institutional Equity. Faculty and staff who are also students, or a student who also has a staff appointment, may be subject to procedures described in the "Statement of Student Rights and Responsibilities."
  • Claims that a member of the faculty or staff has violated employment contracts will be investigated by Academic Human Resources.

A graduate student who alleges misconduct by a faculty or staff member must pursue the complaint in the most appropriate forum; a student may not pursue the same allegation in different venues. Students who agree to have a dispute mediated under this policy agree not to pursue the same matter in any other forum within the University. Students should consult the Resolution Officer in their school or college to decide which avenue is best for their circumstances, and about counseling and University resources that may be appropriate.

Resolution Board

Schools and colleges participating in this dispute resolution process designate a member of the faculty or senior administrative staff to serve as the unit's Resolution Officer. This person, in accordance with the principles and processes described below, oversees the mediation of disputes or disagreements covered under this policy. The Resolution Officers of the schools and colleges constitute the Resolution Board, which is convened by the Rackham Resolution Officer. The Rackham Resolution Board also includes four to five Rackham students who serve as Resolution Counselors for students. The Resolution Board keeps current with best practices for dispute resolution, provides mutual advice and support in the handling of disputes, and shares lessons learned with the Rackham Dean and the graduate programs about ways to improve policies, practices and communication. The Resolution Board may seek advice from faculty and other University offices with expertise on mediation and conflict resolution.

Dispute Resolution Principles and Responsibilities

Adherence to principles of impartiality, confidentiality, timeliness, and effective communication are important to successful dispute resolution. The Rackham Graduate School works with the schools and colleges to ensure that these principles are understood and observed in the dispute resolution process.

1. Impartiality

A Resolution Officer will remain impartial. A Resolution Officer will recuse him/herself for a conflict of interest. Such circumstances include if the Resolution Officer has a personal or professional relationship with any party in the dispute that would impede his or her impartiality. In such instances, the Dean of the school or college may ask another impartial and qualified staff or faculty member to handle the dispute resolution process, or may ask the Rackham Resolution Officer to ask another member of the Resolution Board to provide this service. A student with concerns about the impartiality of a resolution process within his or her school or college should seek advice from the Rackham Resolution Officer. If the Rackham Resolution Officer, in consultation with the Resolution Board, concludes that such concerns about the substance or appearance of impartiality are substantial, another member of the Board may be asked to take the case.

2. Confidentiality

  • A student may meet informally to discuss an issue with any Resolution Officer or Resolution Counselor. While these discussions will remain confidential to the extent permitted by law, confidentiality will not be maintained if the Resolution Officer or Resolution Counselor believes that disclosure is necessary to avoid an imminent risk of serious harm or is required by law.
  • All parties implicated in the complaint have the right to know the details of the issues that give rise to the dispute. A student may not anonymously request a formal dispute resolution process.
  • The Resolution Officer or Resolution Counselor may consult with the Rackham Resolution Officer and the Resolution Board, who will maintain confidentiality. Parties involved in a formal dispute resolution process are expected to maintain confidentiality so the process can be effective.
  • When the resolution process suggests how academic policies and their implementation may be improved, the Resolution Board may share this information as appropriate with other graduate programs, while maintaining the confidentiality of personal information.
  • Records summarizing the resolution of disputes will be archived by the Resolution Board and the Dean(s) of the relevant school or college. These records will be a resource for the Board. Personal information in these records will be kept confidential.

3. Timeliness

Timely address to disputes is important for successful resolution. Normally, resolution conferences will be held within ten business days from the time the Resolution Officer receives the case. The academic calendar may make it difficult to always adhere to this schedule, but the conference should be convened within a reasonable time.

4. Communication

Schools and colleges should maintain and make public dispute resolution procedures. Schools and colleges should also publicize these procedures to students, faculty and staff. Resolution Officers are available to speak with a student about the purpose and principles of these procedures, and the implications of proceeding with a formal dispute resolution conference, including potential outcomes. The student must be kept fully informed at every step and participate in reaching a resolution.

Resolution Conference

While prompt informal discussion within the unit where the parties are enrolled or appointed can often resolve most disputes, a more formal process may be necessary to address disagreements that may have greater complexity and consequence. The formal resolution of dispute takes place in a resolution conference. Through the resolution conference, the parties seek to reach a mutual understanding of the causes of the dispute and to produce a solution guided by academic policies. The purpose of the resolution conference is to allow parties to a dispute to present their viewpoints, to share information, to clarify concerns and issues, to resolve misunderstandings or interpersonal difficulties that may contribute to an issue, to evaluate options for resolving the problem, and to reach a formal agreement on an outcome intended to resolve the dispute.

The Academic Dispute Resolution Process

In many cases, academic disputes can be quickly and effectively resolved when addressed informally at the local level. Misunderstandings, miscommunications and disagreements often can be resolved through such conversations.

  1. A student may talk with the Graduate Chair as an initial step. The student may also consult informally with the Resolution Officer of the school or college who can offer impartial advice and suggest steps to resolve the issue.
  2. Students in LS&A, which does not have a Resolution Officer, may consult with the Rackham Resolution Officer.
  3. All students are encouraged to seek information and advice from a Rackham student Resolution Counselor, who can offer neutral advice about how to address and resolve disputes.
  4. If informal discussion does not resolve the disagreement, the student may seek a formal resolution conference within the school or college. With the exception of the LS&A, each school and college has a dispute resolution process and designates a faculty or staff member to serve as a Resolution Officer who will conduct this process according to the procedures of the school or college.
  5. Some LS&A departments have dispute resolution processes; students in these departments should seek a formal dispute resolution conference within these programs. For LS&A students whose programs do not have formal procedures, the Rackham Resolution Officer will organize a dispute resolution conference.
  6. The Resolution Officer of the school or college will notify relevant parties and the Resolution Board and include a summary of the issue at disagreement.
  7. When an academic dispute arises between a Rackham student and a faculty member of another school or college, the Rackham Resolution Officer, in consultation with the Resolution Board and the relevant Deans, will determine where the resolution conference process will be held.
  8. Through the dispute resolution process, the parties will develop a resolution plan to which the parties consent. The Resolution Officer will summarize the key points of the agreed resolution in a memo of understanding. The parties to the dispute will sign the memo of understanding, signaling their consent to the terms of the resolution. Copies of the memo will be shared with the relevant Deans and the Resolution Board.
  9. In the event that the parties are unable to reach an agreed resolution, the Resolution Officer will notify the relevant Deans and the Resolution Board in writing that a resolution could not be reached. The Dean of the school or college will refer the matter to the Rackham Resolution Officer within five business days of receiving the school/college's Resolution Officer's report.

Reconsideration

A student may ask the Rackham Resolution Officer to reconsider the dispute if he or she believes that the resolution process at the school or college level did not meet standards of fundamental fairness or if substantial relevant new evidence or information has become available after the resolution conference.

  1. The student must make this request in writing within ten business days after receipt of written notification of the outcome of the resolution conference process in the school or college.
  2. The Rackham Resolution Officer will ask the Resolution Officer of the school or college to provide a written report of the resolution process, and may talk individually with the parties to the dispute.
  3. If the Rackham Resolution Officer and the Resolution Board find that the grounds for reconsideration have been established, they may recommend to the Rackham Dean that the school or college be asked to consider the dispute again or, if circumstances make it difficult to ensure an impartial inquiry, ask that the Resolution Board convene a new dispute resolution conference.
  4. If the Rackham Resolution Officer and the Resolution Board determine that the grounds for reconsideration have not been established, they will recommend to the Rackham Dean that the school/college outcome be upheld. The Rackham Dean will notify the student of the outcome. This ends the reconsideration process.

Rackham Dispute Resolution Process

At the request of the Dean of a school or college, or if a school or college does not have a dispute resolution process, or as the result of a request by a student for reconsideration, the Dean of Rackham may agree to convene a dispute resolution process.

  1. Resolution conferences for new cases or reconsiderations will be held usually within ten business days of the initiation of the case.
  2. The Rackham Resolution Officer will invite all parties to submit written statements. The Rackham Resolution Officer may interview other persons who may be able to contribute to an understanding of the dispute, or ask them to provide written statements.
  3. For new cases only (i.e., not reconsideration cases), the Rackham Resolution Officer may determine that, on the basis of this inquiry, the claims of the student are without merit. In this case, no further action will be taken.
  4. A resolution conference will be conducted for the purpose of understanding the causes of the dispute and for producing a solution.
  5. The parties in the dispute have the right to respond to claims made by others, either in writing or at the conference itself.
  6. The conference will not be recorded.
  7. The parties will be encouraged to seek a resolution to the dispute by agreeing on a course of action. The Rackham Resolution Officer will summarize the key points of the agreed resolution in a memo of understanding. The parties to the dispute will sign the agreement, signaling their consent to the terms of the resolution. Copies of the agreement will be shared with the relevant Deans and the Resolution Board.
  8. If the parties are unable to reach a resolution through the conference process, they will be asked to submit a summary statement no more than two pages in length. Upon review of the Rackham Resolution Officer's report and of statements submitted by the parties, the Rackham Dean will determine a resolution outcome based on the preponderance of the information presented, and will communicate this to all parties and the Dean and Resolution Officer of the school or college.

Academic Dispute Resolution Board

Architecture and Urban Planning, Taubman College of
Jean Wineman, Associate Dean
Art & Design
Meghan Jellema, Administrative Specialist
Business Administration, Business School
Hyun-soo Ahn, Associate Professor Operations Management Science
Dentistry
Neville McDonald, Clinical Professor
Dentistry-OHS Ph.D. Program
Christopher Fenno, Associate Professor
Education
Shamille Orr, Student Affairs Associate Director
Engineering
Angie Farrehi, Director of the Office of Student Support and Accountability
Tiffany Porties, Assistant Director for Graduate Education
Ford School of Public Policy
Susan Guindi, Director of Student and Academic Services
School of Information
Laura Elgas, Director of Admissions and Student Affairs
Medical School, U-M
Scott Barolo, Director, Cellular and Molecular Biology Program
Music, Theatre and Dance
Freyja Harris, Chief Diversity & Inclusion Officer
Natural Resources and Environment
Sara O'Brien, Director, Office of Academic Programs
Nursing
Melissa Bathish, Research Area Specialist Intermediate and Lecturer
Pharmacy
Mark Nelson, Director of Admissions and Student Counseling Services
Public Health
Adam Dion Ancira-Corrigan, Admissions Associate Director
Rackham Graduate School
Darlene Ray-Johnson, Resolution Officer
School of Kinesiology
Thomas Templin, Associate Dean
School of Social Work
Larry Root, Professor

Last updated: June 21, 2017 - 3:00pm